You know what? Considering how sports-addicted I am, I really haven't incorporated the love to the blog. Today, though, I had a thought that may need a bit of flushing out here.
Why are sports set up to have everyone but ONE team be considered a failure. There is the WORLD CHAMPION and then there are the losers. Such has been swirling in my head since the Philadelphia Flyers, led by
Chrissy Pronger, fell a few shifts short of the Chicago Blackhawks in the quest for Lord Stanley's Cup.
The Blackhawks were a young, fast odds on favorite at the start of the playoffs to hoist the cup, while the Flyers barely squeeked in on the last day as a lowly-seeded underdog. Sure enough, Chicago outlasted the fly-guys and were crowned victorious, but not before the fly-guys sent all us fans on a 3 week ride as exciting as you can ask for from a sports team. They overcame and overcame at a clip only seen in Rambo movies and Martin Luther King documentaries. They deserve something more than being "runner up".
Professional sports is nothing more than a business. A 60 year old hippy told me that just last night. We all know it, quit denying it... The payday is the most important thing. SO- what sense does it make that only 1 team can be the winner. Since the green-backs are the ultimate goal and winning brings in the green-backs, shouldn't we try to get more winners. I think the Flyers championed something... Maybe they deserve a bit more than Eastern Conf. Champions hats. They shouldn't have to go home to their lonely wives with anything less than the ferocious appetite of a champion. They earned it.
Sports though- it's a shit show. Rings and crowns and sneakers that sell for too much. All the hilarious absurdities of it all and all I can think of is how great the Flyers performed. I never expected it. I listened to a few men on the tele-box who seem to sound like they know what they are talking about discount the Flyers every night for 3 weeks, and all the Flyers did was show those greasy fake-tanned suit wearing blabbergasts that they could play hockey and could probably out skate any Yamaguchi in a Mickey Mouse helmet if it came down to that. Tension and pressure are part of ice hockey, but they are also parts of mystery novels. The Flyers became Sherlock Holmes like it was nobody's business.
So- when routing for your team. Whatever team it may be; the Blue Rocks, The Orange-bomber, the Bearenstein Bears, Snoop Dogg's little league team, the crazy South-African dancing soccer team- remember victory is one thing, but there is more to sport than just ending up the champion. There is the roller coaster, there is the camaraderie, there is the edge of the sofa sensation, and there is the fact that eventually... maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow, but someday- everyone will make the statement, "it kind of weirds me out to think I'm X years older than all these dudes."
oop- PS edit... I wanted to mention that I also lost two bets and won 2 bets during the playoffs, all of which I think are worth noting.
Bet 1: 2 Boston v. 7 Flyers round 2 of the Eastern Conf. Playoffs. I bet a friend here when the Flyers were already losing game 1. I had been trying to get a hold of this friend to place a bet, but neither of us are that great at answering our phones. Finally- the night after game 1 I get a phone call from my friend. Earlier, we had sort of agreed to bet, but the stakes were set at the loser having to drink any pint of booze the winner presents him with. Since the Flyers were already in the hole, he gave me odds... He would take a swig out of the pint he bought me... which would have probably been jagermeister. (Note- this bet was washed clean after a double or nothing was placed and the Phillies refused to score runs on the Red Sox the following weekend).
Bet 2: the Penguins v. Flyers bet: wait a sec- these teams didn't meet up in the playoffs!? Well, they almost did, but the Penguins were one pedicure short and couldn't get past the canadians in the second round. The last few years I had lost cases of beer (that ended up being less than cases of beer) in a Flyers v Penguins bet with a Pittsburghian pal. This year, he figured Montreal could beat the Flyers, so I wrangled a (as of yet to be drank) case of beer from the Flyers shellacking of the Habs.
Bet 3: I bet a friend who grew up in this area, then moved to Chicago that the Flyers would beat chi-town. Stakes- loser buys the winner dinner. Sure enough, after many a text message- I think I am buying a steak covered deep dish pizza next time I am in Chicago. I should mention that this person suddenly became a blackhawks fan after growing up in Flyer country.
Bet 4: this bet was made with another Chicago transfer. The stakes are the most interesting part. The loser of the bet (me) will have to buy a drink of the winner's choice and present it to a bar patron, also of the winner's choice. So apparently next time I have a drink in Chicago I am going to have to buy a sea breeze for whatever man has the most tattooes at the bar. Does that make sense? ah geez... screw it.